The legal facts

The legal facts:

 

The use of Chlorine Dioxide (CDS) is not prohibited, but it is not authorized as a medicine, creating a legal dilemma surrounding its use. In countries like Peru and Argentina, doctors who fulfill their patients' requests for Chlorine Dioxide treatment are facing persecution. However, the International Court of Human Rights has instructed member countries to repeal any regulations that violate human rights.

 

According to the Declaration of Helsinki, an internationally recognized treaty by the World Medical Association, physicians have a duty to promote and ensure the health, well-being, and rights of their patients, including those participating in medical research. The physician's knowledge and conscience must be subordinated to fulfilling this duty, as stated in the fourth article.

 

The seventh article of the Declaration emphasizes that medical research should adhere to ethical standards that promote and ensure respect for all human beings while protecting their health and individual rights.

 

The ninth article of the Declaration emphasizes the right to self-determination.

 

The United Nations Economic and Social Council affirms the obligation to protect and influence the implementation of laws or measures to ensure the quality of healthcare services and allow physicians and other healthcare professionals to gather their experiences.

 

If a doctor administers Chlorine Dioxide at a patient's request and subsequently faces termination from their workplace, it can be considered illegal. The will of the patient takes precedence when they have been duly informed about the treatment.

 

If healthcare professionals abandon a patient due to their refusal to use chlorine dioxide, resulting in the patient's demise, they can be held legally and ethically accountable for medical negligence. In cases where family members insist on such treatment, they must submit their request in writing. If their request is denied, they should escalate their complaint to the medical director or supervisor. If no satisfactory resolution is reached, they may involve government authorities.

 

In situations where doctors argue that chlorine dioxide is a toxic substance, it is essential to request scientific evidence supporting their claim. If a Health Minister, despite being informed about the potential therapeutic effects of chlorine dioxide (even in the absence of immediate scientific evidence), chooses to disregard this information and prohibit its public use, they can be reported to national courts, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

 

If an official disseminates false information about chlorine dioxide, thereby violating the international human right to accurate and timely information, they can be legally denounced. In cases where such misinformation leads to the loss of lives, it may even be considered a crime of genocide. This information is sourced from Guillermo Robertson, Federal Commissioner of the International Commission on Human Rights.

 

Is it morally acceptable to allow people to perish simply because an institution has not approved the use of chlorine dioxide, despite its potential effectiveness in safe and appropriate doses? Who should be held responsible for these deaths? Shouldn't we attempt potential treatments when all other options seem futile?

 

Many individuals do not have the luxury of time to wait for the lengthy and costly procedures required to legalize a substance, which can often take up to a decade or more. Andreas Kalcker, an influential figure and my esteemed teacher, firmly asserts that no government or law should supersede the fundamental Human Law that aims to preserve life with dignity. He advocates for the right to self-experimentation, particularly for those who lack alternative options in the face of terminal or severe illnesses. 

 

Any law that prohibits voluntary use of such treatments inherently becomes criminal and violates the fundamental right to life. The right to life and self-determination should always take precedence over any other considerations.

 

When science transforms into a dogmatic belief system, it becomes impervious to even the most compelling arguments.

 

 

Very important Note:

 

CLO2 (CDS or Chlorine Dioxide) has been approved by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the USA (EPA 2020) and by the World Health Organization (WHO) for use in water intended for human consumption, as it does not leave behind toxic residues (EPA 2000, WHO 2002). This serves as official proof of the non-toxic nature of CDS.

 

Furthermore, the FDA recommends the use of CLO2 as a permitted additive in food and as an antimicrobial agent (disinfectant).

According to the World Medical Association (WMA) declaration of 2003, "When legislation and medical ethics are in conflict, physicians should try to change the legislation. If this conflict occurs, ethical responsibilities prevail over legal obligations."

 

When a patient, facing a disease, seeks relief or wishes to explore a therapeutic option such as CDS that has indications of usefulness, it is the doctor's duty to support the patient, acquire knowledge, and conduct studies (Article 27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948). With this article, you have the legal right to take a doctor to court for negligence, malpractice, and endangering your life if they refuse to consider the application of CDS.

 

Note: It's important to consult with a medical professional regarding the use of any therapeutic option or treatment. The information provided here is for reference purposes only and should not replace medical advice.

​

Disclaimer:

Information from this website, including videos, graphics, images, and pages (“content”) is entirely for informational purposes only. Uses of this information are entirely the responsibility of those who choose to apply this information for their personal health and/or wellbeing. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you many have regarding a medical condition. This information is not intended as medical advice, prescription, prognosis, treatment or diagnosis for any disease or illness, and should not be used as a replacement for any medical treatment you may currently be undergoing.